Re: building boost statically

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 06:47:55PM -0400,  Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We'd really like to use the latest boost, mainly so that we can use 
> small_vector in a zillion places and avoid extra memory allocations.  The 
> distros, as always, are behind.
From a distribution perspective, LESS static building is better, so this
proposal is a concern, but I do realize that the Gentoo/ArchLinux/CoreOS
perspective is very different than the Ubuntu LTS perspective.

What's the state of having a more-up-to-date Boost in things like Ubuntu
backports, so that you don't have the overhead of having to maintain
your own boost packages or statically link?

If support for statically linking a newer Boost is brought it, please,
please keep dynamic boost builds as fully supported, for distributions
that can keep up to date. As a bonus, at some point in the future, when
the slower distributions catch up, you might be able to escape the
static again.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Trustee
E-Mail     : robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG FP   : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux