Can you point me to the test in question? Thx YuriW On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, it's fine. Note that the upgrade test failure seems like an > issue with the test itself (running radosgw-admin/radosgw while > upgrading the libraries). > > Yehuda > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Abhishek Varshney > <abhishek.varshney@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Yehuda, >> >> A gentle reminder. We are waiting for your response to move ahead with >> next infernalis release v9.2.1. >> >> Thanks >> Abhishek >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Abhishek Varshney >> <abhishek.varshney@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Yehuda, >>> >>> The next infernalis release as found at >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite ( >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the >>> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing >>> ? >>> >>> The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test ( >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to >>> be fixed before the release ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Abhishek > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
