Yeah, it's fine. Note that the upgrade test failure seems like an issue with the test itself (running radosgw-admin/radosgw while upgrading the libraries). Yehuda On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Abhishek Varshney <abhishek.varshney@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Yehuda, > > A gentle reminder. We are waiting for your response to move ahead with > next infernalis release v9.2.1. > > Thanks > Abhishek > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Abhishek Varshney > <abhishek.varshney@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Yehuda, >> >> The next infernalis release as found at >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite ( >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the >> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing >> ? >> >> The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test ( >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to >> be fixed before the release ? >> >> Thanks >> Abhishek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
