On 13/02/2016 01:13, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Abhishek Varshney > <abhishek.varshney@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> The next infernalis release as found at >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed most of the CephFS >> suite ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-19 ) except for 1 >> failure, which was not seen at a later run ( >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-26 ). Do you think the >> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing >> ? > > Uh, assuming I'm reading this correctly, you've hit a known > intermittent bug which happened to show up on one run, but not the > next. > > You can release without the fix (it's not a regression), but please > realize that we have a lot of intermittent bugs so just because an > issue doesn't appear in one run doesn't mean the issue is gone. :) Hi Greg, We realize there are intermittent bugs. This is why we're asking you to decide wether this specific bug should be a blocker for the release or not. What do you think ? Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
