On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Abhishek Varshney <abhishek.varshney@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > The next infernalis release as found at > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed most of the CephFS > suite ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-19 ) except for 1 > failure, which was not seen at a later run ( > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-26 ). Do you think the > infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing > ? Uh, assuming I'm reading this correctly, you've hit a known intermittent bug which happened to show up on one run, but not the next. You can release without the fix (it's not a regression), but please realize that we have a lot of intermittent bugs so just because an issue doesn't appear in one run doesn't mean the issue is gone. :) -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
