Hi, I think that is correct, at least in RHEL. As long as we continue to support the fcgi integration in rgw, this should work. There really does seem to be a lot of application of various header, logging, and cache-control customization setups that we don't want to emulate in rgw itself. I'm interested in hearing feedback from folks about the acceptability/preference for or against proxy vs. embedding, esp. larger deployments. Matt ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Sage Weil" <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Nathan Cutler" <ncutler@xxxxxxx>, "Ken Dreyer" <kdreyer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ceph Development" > <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 8:16:05 PM > Subject: Re: apache/fcgi deprecation? > > Right, apache can be used as a proxy. In any case, my understanding is > that it's not a dependency, but we'll still have the ability to > install it (mod-proxy-fcgi) if needed (correct me if I'm wrong here). > There aren't any current plans that I know of to remove the rgw fcgi > frontend. > > Yehuda > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Matt, Yehuda- > > > > What do you think? There are some valid use-cases for wanting apache (or > > whatever) in front as it gives you access to a bunch of modules. On the > > other hand, you can do the same with a proxy. > > > > sage > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Nathan Cutler wrote: > > > >> On 02/08/2016 11:57 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > >> > Sure, please do it! > >> > > >> > I think it's just a matter of no one having time to remove it. > >> > >> So we could remove the FastCGI dependency from the packaging, too? > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > I was just browsing the RGW documentation and noticed that parts of it > >> > > are > >> > > still apache/fcgi-oriented (with no mention of civetweb) even in > >> > > master. > >> > > > >> > > My impression was that civetweb is now recommended for RGW deployments > >> > > as > >> > > it > >> > > is faster. Is that true? And is there a plan to deprecate/drop > >> > > apache/fcgi > >> > > support, or will it remain indefinitely? > >> > > > >> > > Would it be a good idea to expunge apache/fcgi from the docs and point > >> > > folks > >> > > to civetweb instead? > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Nathan Cutler > >> > > Software Engineer Distributed Storage > >> > > SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. > >> > > Tel.: +420 284 084 037 > >> > > -- > >> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" > >> > > in > >> > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Nathan Cutler > >> Software Engineer Distributed Storage > >> SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. > >> Tel.: +420 284 084 037 > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >> > >> > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-707-0660 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
