Sure, please do it! I think it's just a matter of no one having time to remove it. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I was just browsing the RGW documentation and noticed that parts of it are > still apache/fcgi-oriented (with no mention of civetweb) even in master. > > My impression was that civetweb is now recommended for RGW deployments as it > is faster. Is that true? And is there a plan to deprecate/drop apache/fcgi > support, or will it remain indefinitely? > > Would it be a good idea to expunge apache/fcgi from the docs and point folks > to civetweb instead? > > -- > Nathan Cutler > Software Engineer Distributed Storage > SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. > Tel.: +420 284 084 037 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
