Re: Infernalis on NVMe cephx authentication impact

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2016 04:52 PM, Mark Nelson wrote:
Hi Orlando,

Hrm, looks like https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3896 didn't make it
into Hammer at release. :(  That might also account for a large part of
the performance disparity.  Coincidentally Josh Durgin made a branch
with the PR backported to hammer a couple of weeks ago here:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/wip-auth-hammer

Turns out it fixes a bug [0] in addition to being faster, so expect it
in a future hammer release.

Has anyone measured the overhead of message signing (the 'cephx sign messages' option)? It's on by default with cephx, but can be disabled
separately. What auth settings were these tests using?

It may be worth requiring message signatures by default now that it's
been supported in the kernel client since 3.19.

Josh

[0] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14620
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux