Eh, Sage had a point that Transaction has a bunch of little fields which would have to be filled in -- its move constructor would be less trivial than unique_ptr's. -Sam On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Adam C. Emerson <aemerson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/12/2015, Casey Bodley wrote: > [snip] >> The queue_transactions() interface could take a container of Transactions, >> rather than pointers to Transactions, and the ObjectStore would move them >> out of the container into whatever representation it prefers. > [snip] > > Or a pointer and count (or we could steal array_view from GSL). That way we > could pass in any continguous range (std::vector or even a std::array or > regular C style array allocated on the stack.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
