Yeah, it should be fine. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > After todays private discussion and the merge of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6161, I will assume the current hammer branch (7f485ed5aa620fe982561663bf64356b7e2c38f2) is ready for QE to start their own round of testing. If I misinterpreted what you wrote, please speak up and I'll do what's needed ;-) > > Cheers > > On 02/10/2015 22:31, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Yehuda, >> >> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-58). >> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> Cheers >> >> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#Release-information has direct links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.3 in case you need more context about one of them. >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
