Re: Reply: [PATCH] rbd: prevent kernel stack blow up on rbd map

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Caoxudong <cao.xudong@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> By the way, do you think it's necessary that we add the clone-chain-length limit in user-space code too?

librbd is different in a lot of ways and there isn't a clean separation
between the client part (i.e. what is essentially reimplemented in the
kernel) and the rest (management and maintenance parts, etc).  It's
certainly not necessary, whether it's desirable - I'm not sure.  Also,
librbd limit, if we were to introduce one, would probably have to be
bigger.

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux