RE: perf counters from a performance discrepancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I finally got around to looking at the dump_historic_ops output for the 
> 1-client and 2-client cases.
> As you recall these are all read-ops.  so the events in the dump are
>    initiated
>    reached_pg
>    started
>    done
> 
> The pattern I see for most of the slow ops recorded in the dump is:
> 
>    * In the 1-client case the typical slow op has duration between 50-65 ms
>      and usually most of this is the interval between reached_pg and started.
> 
>    * In the 2-client case the typical slow op has duration between 95-120 ms
>      and again usually most of this is the interval between reached_pg 
>      and started.
> 
> Could someone describe what the interval between reached_pg and started 
> means?

I think the slow part is probably find_object_context() (although to be 
fair tons of stuff happens here, see do_op()).  You could test this 
theory or otherwise narrow this down with additional event 
markers lke

diff --git a/src/osd/ReplicatedPG.cc b/src/osd/ReplicatedPG.cc
index d6f3084..6faccc2 100644
--- a/src/osd/ReplicatedPG.cc
+++ b/src/osd/ReplicatedPG.cc
@@ -1691,10 +1691,12 @@ void ReplicatedPG::do_op(OpRequestRef& op)
     return;
   }
 
+  op->mark_event("about to find");
   int r = find_object_context(
     oid, &obc, can_create,
     m->has_flag(CEPH_OSD_FLAG_MAP_SNAP_CLONE),
     &missing_oid);
+  op->mark_event("found");
 
   if (r == -EAGAIN) {
     // If we're not the primary of this OSD, and we have


sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux