On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 00:24:27 +0200 Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Each already existing user would obtain empty bucket namespace > by default. It will be possible to create user with his own, unique > namespace. [...] > 2. We will always need ID of namespace in order to access proper > bucket entry points. [...] > I would like to ask for reviews of the idea and feedback. I still don't understand how this is different from tenants in wip-5073. Each tenant defines what amounts to a namespace for buckets. Could you clear this up? I heard you discussing it a little bit during the RGW team stand-up call, but I can't wrap my head around it. Secondly, have you given a thought to exact API here, or is it all hand-waved for now? As you may know, initially I hoped we'd get by without adding any special syntax for tenants. Just off-load it onto the authentication system, I thought. That didn't work and now we have the tenant$user syntax allowed all over. What I mean by that, a client has to do "swift -U tenant\$user:subuser -K pass" in 5073, and that looks a bit fraught. I presume you avoided that. Specifically though, imagine I'm doing "radosgw-admin user info", what do I get under your plan? -- Pete P.S. What repo/branch do you use for this? I know you quoted it before, but just so we're at the same place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
