> -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Haomai Wang > Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:58 PM > To: Sage Weil > Hi Sage, > > I notice your post in rocksdb page about make rocksdb aware of short alive > key/value pairs. > > I think it would be great if one keyvalue db impl could support different key > types with different store behaviors. But it looks like difficult for me to add > this feature to an existing db. > > [..] Somewhat radical (and maybe also reckless) point of view here, but do we actually need that RocksDB? I'm perfectly aware of fact that writing own RocksDB replacement will take a lot of man-hours, but maybe they'll be better spent than going around current RocksDB limitations, fixing their bugs and tuning Ceph for their code? With best regards / Pozdrawiam Piotr Dałek ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
