RE: Ceph Hackathon: More Memory Allocator Testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Blinick, Stephen L
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:58 PM
> 
> [..
> Regarding the all-HDD or high density HDD nodes, is it certain these issues
> with tcmalloc don't apply, due to lower performance, or would it potentially
> be something that would manifest over a longer period of time
> (weeks/months) of running?   I know we've seen some weirdness attributed
> to tcmalloc on our 10-disk 20-node cluster with HDD's &  SSD journals, but it
> took a few weeks.

And it takes me just a few minutes with rados bench to reproduce this issue on mixed-storage node (SSDs, SAS disks, high-capacity SATA disks, etc). 
See here: http://ceph.predictor.org.pl/cpu_usage_over_time.xlsx 
It gets even worse when rebalancing starts...

With best regards / Pozdrawiam
Piotr Dałek
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux