RE: Package issue in hammer branch on ubuntu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks. There are no changes from my end, just tried building the packages to test internally with the latest code base.

0. 94-2.2 is intentional?

Varada

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Dreyer [mailto:kdreyer@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:42 AM
To: Varada Kari <Varada.Kari@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Package issue in hammer branch on ubuntu

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Varada Kari <Varada.Kari@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Seems in debian/control , ceph version is mentioned as 0.94.2-2 than
> 0.94.2-1. Change log files contains the build till 0.94.2-1. Made the
> following change, my installation went through.

It sounds like you're patching Ceph and doing your own build?

If that's the case, add a new debian/changelog entry for 0.94.2-2, describing your changes.

You just need to bump the version to something >=2 .

- Ken

________________________________

PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies).

��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux