Re: Signed-off-by and aliases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Loic Dachary wrote:

> 
> 
> On 17/08/2015 22:58, Alex Elsayed wrote:
> 
>> The S-o-B tag, then, simply says "If you look, you'll find my affirmation
>> of intent to follow the DCO" - it is not, in itself, anything other than
>> a pointer. This prevents people from copypasta'ing the S-o-B line as a
>> magic incantation, without understanding the meaning. (Which the kernel
>> has found _does_ happen _anyway_, but with the "actually submitted a DCO"
>> requirement they can _detect_ that.)
> 
> Oh, I overlooked that, thanks for the information. I can see how that can
> make a difference indeed.

This is a really good article about how the DCO system works, and why:
https://lwn.net/Articles/592503/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux