Re: [PATCH] ceph: Using file->f_flags rather than flags check O_CREAT.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Ma, Jianpeng <jianpeng.ma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Because flags removed the O_CREAT, so we should use file->f_flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/ceph/file.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
> > index 8b79d87..e1347cf 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int ceph_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >         ihold(inode);
> >
> >         req->r_num_caps = 1;
> > -       if (flags & O_CREAT)
> > +       if (file->f_flags & O_CREAT)
> >                 parent_inode = ceph_get_dentry_parent_inode(file->f_path.dentry);
> >         err = ceph_mdsc_do_request(mdsc, parent_inode, req);
> >         iput(parent_inode);
> 
> In this case, we do not need parent_inode because file already exists.
> I'd like to remove the code that finds parent inode.

Do you mean that O_CREAT is only removed in the case where the inode 
already exists?  Because there is at least one case where we do a single 
op to the MDS that does the create + open, and in that case we do need to 
make sure a dir fsync waits for it to commit.  As long as we don't break 
that one!

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux