Hi Loic. Yes, https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 is problematic. Do you mean should we include these RPs in v0.94.3? These RPs fix a bug in rare configure, I think it’s not a big deal to not include it in v0.94.3 Regards Yan, Zheng > On Aug 4, 2015, at 00:32, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > I assume the "file handle reference counting" is about http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12088 which is backported as described at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12319. It was indeed somewhat problematic and required two pull requests: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 (authored by Yan Zheng) and https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5427 (merged by Yan Zheng). > > Cheers > > On 03/08/2015 18:01, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#fs). Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> I'm on vacation right now, but the only thing I see there that might >> be iffy is the backport of the file handle reference counting. As long >> as that is all good (Zheng?) things look fine to me. >> -Greg >> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#Release-information has direct links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.2 in case you need more context about one of them. >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
