I tend to support (++) ----- "Piotr Dałek" <Piotr.Dalek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Haomai Wang [mailto:haomaiwang@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:26 PM > > > > Yes, some fields only used for special ops. But union may increase > the > > complexity of stuct. > > Not by that much, actual changes would be only in coding and encoding, > rest of the code should remain the same. > > > And the extra memory may not a problem because "Ops" in one > transaction > > should be within ten. > > This equals to at least around 720 bytes that must be stored in RAM > and transferred through the wire. > > With best regards / Pozdrawiam > Piotr Dałek > N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+��ݢj"�� -- Matt Benjamin CohortFS, LLC. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://cohortfs.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
