RE: Checking on wip-blkin branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



HI, Josh and Andrew

I just rebase the wip-blkin branch to 9.0.1, and did a rados bench test on that

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4963


Lttng result is collected successfully

Considering on rados testsuits failing issues, I don't have a test environment, any suggests?

Best Regards,
-Chendi

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Durgin [mailto:jdurgin@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 10:45 PM
To: Xue, Chendi; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andrew Shewmaker
Subject: Re: Checking on wip-blkin branch

Hi Chendi,

On 06/09/2015 04:59 AM, Xue, Chendi wrote:
> Hi, Josh and Andrew
>
> Today, I applied wip-blkin branch to my 4 nodes ceph setup, and created zipkin-based lttng results successfully.
>
> Since we wanna using this latency analyzing methodology on further release or on keyvalue store and newstore.
> I am wondering what is the gap to merge blkin into master? Can I help to rebase to master, so we can merge this branch?

That'd be great! Andrew and I simply haven't had time to finish fixing up the remaining issues. Running it through a rados suite showed some more changes were necessary to handle more complicated osd usage - you'll see several osd crashes in this rados suite run [1].

The code was looking fine to me, it just needs rebasing and debugging so it can pass the rados test suite.

Thanks!
Josh

[1]
http://pulpito.ceph.com/joshd-2015-03-25_17:29:16-rados-wip-blkin---blkin-multi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux