On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > QE validation status. > > All detailed information is summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 > > Team leads pls review for do "go"-"no-go" decision. > > Issues to be considered: > > rados - passed ~2.8K jobs, listed issues (#11660, #11661) are not blockers > (NOTE: we also agreed to use the "0/7th" rule for future point releases, e.g. passing "--subset 0/7" will be sufficient for release) > > knfs - #11789, #11790 - per Sage - not blockers; Greg, John - agreed? Mmmm. I'm split in that these look to be new and I don't understand anything about them, but we also don't care a ton about NFS re-export of CephFS right now and I don't see how the current backport queue could have induced them... > > samba - I assumed that failured in http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-05-18_13:46:55-samba-hammer-testing-basic-multi/ due to #6613, Greg pls confirm. That looks to be the case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
