QE validation status. All detailed information is summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 Team leads pls review for do "go"-"no-go" decision. Issues to be considered: rados - passed ~2.8K jobs, listed issues (#11660, #11661) are not blockers (NOTE: we also agreed to use the "0/7th" rule for future point releases, e.g. passing "--subset 0/7" will be sufficient for release) knfs - #11789, #11790 - per Sage - not blockers; Greg, John - agreed? samba - I assumed that failured in http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-05-18_13:46:55-samba-hammer-testing-basic-multi/ due to #6613, Greg pls confirm. upgrade/client-upgrade - blocked by #11546 (3 jobs passed) upgrade/firefly-x - blocked by #11546 upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x - blocked by #11546 Sage, Loic are you willing to push this release out without upgrade suites run due to packaging issues (NOTE: upgrade/giant-x -> hammer passed on all distros)? Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Abhishek L" <abhishek.lekshmanan@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Hi Yuri, The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the tests run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a794ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016a0021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492#QE-Validation These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on rgw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd suite because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. The other two issues listed as blockers are http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to hammer http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue that can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
