On Wed, 20 May 2015, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote: > On 04/29/2015 06:34 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Mark Nelson wrote: > >> On 04/29/2015 12:02 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > >>> So, I picked 6789 way back in commit > >>> dc38de9b14c5386f9f446124ca6d6673eb8a1e20 because it was unused according > >>> to nmap-services. It's there now, in use by smc-https (whatever that is), > >>> and says it was registered in 2002. I guess the nmap-services file I > >>> looked at at the time was out of date? > >>> > >>> In any case, if we want an IANA assigned number, we'll need to change it. > >>> > >>> We should be able to make a transition reasonably painless by making > >>> clients try both ports when none is specified for some period. > >>> > >>> I'm assuming it's worth the effort... what do you think? > >> > >> Yes, I think it's worth it. Better now than when we are 10x bigger than > >> <large storage vendor> right? ;) > > > > Hmm, we could go for something < 1024 too, but that will make non-root > > ceph-mon's more annoying, I suspect. > > > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=unassigned > > > > 35168 seems available (range 35007-35353). > > And before someone thinks I'm on something, 35168 is the result of: > > >>> p = 0 > >>> for x in reversed('ceph'): > ... j = len(str(p)) > ... if p == 0: > ... j = 0 > ... p += (ord(x)-ord('a')+1)*pow(10,j) Heh, now I know you're on something! What about CE4h = 3300? sage > Although definitely not as easy to remember (or type) as 6789 :( > > -Joao > > p.s.: 31337 is also available ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
