On 04/29/2015 12:02 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
So, I picked 6789 way back in commit dc38de9b14c5386f9f446124ca6d6673eb8a1e20 because it was unused according to nmap-services. It's there now, in use by smc-https (whatever that is), and says it was registered in 2002. I guess the nmap-services file I looked at at the time was out of date? In any case, if we want an IANA assigned number, we'll need to change it. We should be able to make a transition reasonably painless by making clients try both ports when none is specified for some period. I'm assuming it's worth the effort... what do you think?
Yes, I think it's worth it. Better now than when we are 10x bigger than <large storage vendor> right? ;)
Mark
sage
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
