Re: master vs. next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-05-15 12:45, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> If you need to fix something that is broken in next, then you target
> next.  I'm sure sometimes on an ad-hoc basis commits are cherry-picked
> from master into next or even go directly into next to expedite things,
> but that's rare and not something a newcomer should be concerned about.

SubmittingPatches says to target next for bugfixes. So far I have only
been pushing bugfixes, so I have been targeting that branch. And when
the patch is merged, it goes directly into next. So I don't understand
why you say that's rare and not something I should be concerned about?

-- 
Nathan Cutler
Software Engineer Distributed Storage
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
Tel.: +420 284 084 037
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux