Re: Firefly integration branch : OK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 27/04/2015 11:19, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
> Hi loic, can we merge PR (4414 ~ 4416) into integration branch now

As soon as the pull requests 4385, 4384, 4382 are merged we can reset the integration branch will all pending firefly pull requests and start another round :-)

Cheers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 4:06 PM
> To: Shu, Xinxin
> Cc: Ceph Development
> Subject: Firefly integration branch : OK
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I saw this morning the firefly integration branch passed rados and rbd suites :-) 
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#rados
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#rbd
> 
> The issue has been updated accordingly. It means the following pull requests passed:
> 
> $ git log --merges --oneline 12143ff9b25fdd96f8d1a9cecb1329c7f354d414..b91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79
> b91bbb4 Merge 4245: librbd: snap_remove should ignore -ENOENT errors 6245bed Merge 4206: librbd: acquire cache_lock before refreshing parent
> ef08aa9 Merge 4185: FAILED assert(soid < scrubber.start || soid >= scrubber.end) ae1b18a Merge 3963: Rados.shutdown() dies with Illegal instruction (core dumped) 056db0f Merge 4385: osd: ENOENT on clone
> e4b1fd1 Merge 4384: pg stuck stale after create with activation delay 597124b Merge 4383: erasure-code-profile set races with erasure-code-profile rm
> b7bbd43 Merge 4382: osd/PGLog.h: 279: FAILED assert(log.log.size() == log_keys_debug.size())
> 
> Ouf ot these, three are backports ready to be reviewed by their original authors:
> 
> 056db0f Merge 4385: osd: ENOENT on clone https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4385
> e4b1fd1 Merge 4384: pg stuck stale after create with activation delay https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4384
> b7bbd43 Merge 4382: osd/PGLog.h: 279: FAILED assert(log.log.size() == log_keys_debug.size())
> 
> The simplest way would be to ask for their review with a comment in the pull request, with a reference to the test suite results so they know it passed the suites. Will you have time to do this today ? If you don't have time, just let me know and I'll do it for you.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> 
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!tml=
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux