On 03/30/2015 10:34 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:45:55 +0200, Sage Weil wrote:
These packages are from downstream Fedora. What's missing are more up
to date packages built and published at ceph.com. The distro only ships
one version of Ceph (the most recent LTS), while ceph.com gets everything
and ceph-deploy let's you choose which stable series or development branch
to install. We're also not doing any testing on f21.
That's not the Fedora way. LTS-like packages are not for Fedora, those are
for CentOS/RHEL (but where Ceph LTS is already present). Latest development
packages are for Fedora Rawhide. And for other cases there is also
https://fedorahosted.org/copr .
In that case, I think the latest stable release (e.g., giant) should go in
Fedora. Maybe we could put the latest development release in Rawhide, but
I'm nto sure. They're really not intended for end users.
sage
FWIW, I've got some of our performance gear on fedora 20 right now and
happily use the gitbuilder packages (though there are some annoying
dependency issues that require different excludes during the yum
installation). It's incredibly convenient to be able to simply change
the repo and grab the newest build from different versions the same way
we do in Ubuntu. Hopefully regardless of whatever other decisions are
made, we can retain this kind of workflow with the gitbuilder releases.
Mark
I have filed for Fedora-shipped ceph-deploy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207275
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
