Hi Yehuda, Your backport of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a9dd4af401328e8f9071dee52470a0685ceb296b at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3645 was added to the dumpling-backports branch and the RGW suite run came back green. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february I should add that because of environmental instability (IMHO) I ran the suite twice. That produced at least one successful run of each job. For the record the first run is: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-b5e871fe027db3b25f9129ae3e5b2326a89467c5-6-february Do you think rgw is ready for the next dumpling point release ? Cheers On 06/02/2015 00:07, Loic Dachary wrote: > Thanks ! > > On 05/02/2015 23:59, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 2:38:29 PM >>> Subject: rgw and the next dumpling release >>> >>> Hi Yehuda, >>> >>> The rados teuthology suite for the next dumpling release as found in >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports came back green >>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-03_14:46:09-rgw-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/. >>> Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>> >> >> We should also backport a9dd4af401328e8f9071dee52470a0685ceb296b to dumpling. I think I saw a dumpling run failing due to the lack of this one, and since we now run on environments that use apache 2.4. Looking at this commit, it's not going to be applied trivially, so I'm preparing one for dumpling now. >> >> Yehuda >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
