I would say #9854 is critical for this dumpling point release since it fixes a regression that would otherwise be introduced by this point release. -- Jason Dillaman Red Hat dillaman@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Jason Dillaman" <dillaman@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Josh Durgin" <jdurgin@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 9:17:39 AM Subject: Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release Hi Jason, Thanks for taking time to check :-) http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 is indeed in the list of issues that need backporting for dumpling: http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling#issues-that-need-backporting so is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10299. I'm happy to do another round of testing if you think these two need to be in the next release. Otherwise they will be in the next point release. I'm hopeful we'll be able to do more frequent point releases in the future. On 06/02/2015 15:05, Jason Dillaman wrote:> I'll take a look at it today, but my gut tells me it probably has something to do w/ a new version of QEMU (assuming the binary isn't source controlled). On a semi-related note, I just discovered that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 is missing a dumpling backport request. I'll get a dumpling pull request for that issue ASAP. > Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
