Yeah, that's probably new. -Sam On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Sam, > > I stumbled upon what seems to be a leak at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-29_15:41:06-rados-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/730305/ and the valgrind xml file is at http://tracker.ceph.com/attachments/download/1610/v.txt > > <text>612 (584 direct, 28 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 268 of 287</text> > <fn>operator new(unsigned long)</fn> > <fn>ReplicatedPG::get_object_context(hobject_t const&, bool)</fn> > <line>4585</line> > <fn>ReplicatedPG::find_object_context(hobject_t const&, ObjectContext**, bool, snapid_t*)</fn> > <line>4658</line> > <fn>ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)</fn> > <line>835</line> > <fn>PG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> > <line>1455</line> > <fn>OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>, std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> > <line>7169</line> > <fn>OSD::OpWQ::_process(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> > <line>7141</line> > <fn>ThreadPool::WorkQueueVal<std::pair<boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>, std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest> >, boost::intrusive_ptr<PG> >::_void_process(void*, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> > <line>191</line> > <fn>ThreadPool::worker(ThreadPool::WorkThread*)</fn> > <line>128</line> > <fn>ThreadPool::WorkThread::entry()</fn> > <line>318</line> > <fn>start_thread</fn> > <line>312</line> > <fn>clone</fn> > <line>111</line> > > A quick grep of get_object_context in redmine does not hit. Does it ring a bell ? > > Cheers > > dumpling backport inventory: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 > ticket: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10697 > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
