On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/12/2015 06:26 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> >> Hi Josh, >> >> While looking at errors from a giant (plus backports) run of the RBD >> suite, I stumbled upon: >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10513 >> >> and the error is unclear (at least to me ;-). Would you have an idea ? For >> information the backports included are all the pull requests mentionned at >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501. > > > Thanks for organizing these Loic! > > There's no trace of the actual error in the teuthology or ceph client > logs. Looking at the syslogs, this and several other failures from that > run were from running out of memory. This happened with and without > caching, so I suspect these tests may simply need more memory in their > current configuration, since osds are sharing it too, and they use much > more with thrashing. Speaking of fsx and thrasher. Last time I tried fsx (both kernel and librbd) couldn't survive thrashing due to watch/notify troubles. Are all the new watch/notify pieces that were supposed to fix this in? Thanks, Ilya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
