On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Mustafa Muhammad > <mustafaa.alhamdaani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Mustafa Muhammad >> <mustafaa.alhamdaani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I am using civetweb in my radosgw, if I use "rgw thread pool size" >>> that is more than 1024, civetweb doesn't work. >>> e.g. >>> rgw thread pool size = 1024 >>> rgw frontends = "civetweb port=80" >>> >>> #ps aux -L | grep rados | wc -l >>> 1096 >>> >>> everything works fine >>> >>> >>> If I use: >>> rgw thread pool size = 1025 >>> rgw frontends = "civetweb port=80" >>> >>> # ps aux -L | grep rados | wc -l >>> 43 >>> >>> And http server is not listening. >>> >>> If I don't use civetweb: >>> rgw thread pool size = 10240 >>> >>> # ps aux -L | grep rados | wc -l >>> 10278 >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Mustafa Muhammad >> >> I found the problem, it is hardcoded here: >> https://github.com/ceph/civetweb/blob/master/src/civetweb.c >> as: >> #define MAX_WORKER_THREADS 1024 >> >> I increased it to 20480 an compiled from source, problem solved. >> I should we make a patch, right? > > Please do, preferably a github pull request. Also, if you could open a > ceph tracker issue with the specific would be great. I wanted to do create a github pull request with this value set to 20480, but thought I should ask if you want it to be hardcoded, I understood that 'rgw_thread_pool_size' maps to 'num_op_thread' in civetweb, is there a hardcoded max for rgw_thread_pool_size so I can set the same for MAX_WORKER_THREADS? What do you suggest? Regards Mustafa > > Thanks, > Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
