Re: [PATCH 0/3] __remove_osd() vs lingering requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/05/2014 11:33 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> These are fixes for the problem I found while trying to reproduce
> recently reopened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5429.  I'm pretty sure
> this is what was reported in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8568 too.
> The exact BUG_ON() it points to is no longer there, but I checked with
> an older kernel and the reproducer I have for this triggered it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>                 Ilya

All three of these look good to me.  The interactions with
these lists has always been a bit too tricky; you've done a
lot to make sense of them.

And I'm sure there are other BUG_ON() (or rbd_assert()) calls
that can be tamed--either removed, changed to warnings, or
changed to simply return errors where possible.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> 
> Ilya Dryomov (3):
>   libceph: unlink from o_linger_requests when clearing r_osd
>   libceph: clear r_req_lru_item in __unregister_linger_request()
>   libceph: change from BUG to WARN for __remove_osd() asserts
> 
>  net/ceph/osd_client.c |    7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux