Re: kerberos / AD requirements, blueprint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:46:06PM -0400, mdw@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I think the overwhelming common implementation is AD - at all sizes
> of organizations from small to large.  But most of those will be
> microsoft-only environments, so aren't particularly relevant to ceph.
> I don't have good stats on the # of openldap/mit sites - but I imagine
> many of them either don't care about samba, or have already invested
> effort in a more or less parallel AD setup.  If you're running a lot
> of microsoft desktops already, you'd have to be pretty passionate
> to not just run AD and call it a day.  For ceph, though, you're
> talking about linux machines - and there, the attraction for AD
> is underwhelming.

I know enough large sites using AD for their Linux nodes as well. So
far I've not seen an overlap with Ceph deployments, though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux