Re: firefly backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2 Aug 2014, Samuel Just wrote:
> 8733 appears to already be in firefly-next.  I added 7999 and 8438.
> 8701 is the lfn collection_move_rename bug.  Do we want to backport
> that one yet?

Yeah, let's get it all in there so we maximize the amount of time it's 
tested.  So far things look good on master.


> -Sam
> 
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sam, Yehuda,
> >
> > I backported a ton of pending stuff to firefly-next.  A bunch of it was
> > the cephtool tests and unwinding it from the mds cli changes.  Also did
> > ceph df writeable space (with fix).
> >
> > I didn't do some of the core OSD stuff, though, namely
> >
> >  8438 ec objeccts are not cleaned up
> >  8701 scrub found obsolete rollback object
> >  7999 pgs share info that isn't persisted
> >  8733 crash in ECBackend::handle_sub_read
> >
> > Those are the 'pending backport' bugs at least; I suspect there are other
> > OSD fixes that should be included.
> >
> > I also didn't do any of the rgw patches, or the s3-tests.
> >
> > Can you take a look at some point and put them in firefly-next?  I'd like
> > to get this point going through the firefly suite soon so that it bakes
> > there for as long as possible before the next point release.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > sage
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux