Re: firefly backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



8733 appears to already be in firefly-next.  I added 7999 and 8438.
8701 is the lfn collection_move_rename bug.  Do we want to backport
that one yet?
-Sam

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sam, Yehuda,
>
> I backported a ton of pending stuff to firefly-next.  A bunch of it was
> the cephtool tests and unwinding it from the mds cli changes.  Also did
> ceph df writeable space (with fix).
>
> I didn't do some of the core OSD stuff, though, namely
>
>  8438 ec objeccts are not cleaned up
>  8701 scrub found obsolete rollback object
>  7999 pgs share info that isn't persisted
>  8733 crash in ECBackend::handle_sub_read
>
> Those are the 'pending backport' bugs at least; I suspect there are other
> OSD fixes that should be included.
>
> I also didn't do any of the rgw patches, or the s3-tests.
>
> Can you take a look at some point and put them in firefly-next?  I'd like
> to get this point going through the firefly suite soon so that it bakes
> there for as long as possible before the next point release.
>
> Thanks!
> sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux