Re: Fwd: S3 API Compatibility support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There's no good enumeration of the actual apis and features that are
covered by this test. It's definitely a worthy cause to pursue though,
and one that could be done with the help of a willing community
member. The s3 test suite can be found here:

https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests

Thanks,
Yehuda

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:05 AM, M Ranga Swami Reddy
<swamireddy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can you please share the details on coverage of  the ceph/s3-tests suite?
> (mean how many S3 compatibility APIs tests performed with s3-tests suite)
>
> Thanks
> Swami
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:24 PM, M Ranga Swami Reddy
> <swamireddy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Good no know the details. Can you please share the issue ID for bucket
>> lifecycle? My team also could start help here.
>> Regarding the notification - Do we have the issue ID?
>> Yes, the object versioning will be backlog one - I strongly feel we
>> start working on this asap.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Swami
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:14 AM, M Ranga Swami Reddy
>>> <swamireddy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for quick reply.
>>>> Yes,  versioned object - missing in ceph ATM
>>>> Iam looking for: bucket lifecylce (get/put/delete), bucket location,
>>>> put object notification and object restore (ie versioned object) S3
>>>> API support.
>>>> Please let me now any of the above work is in progress or some one
>>>> planned to work on.
>>>
>>>
>>> I opened an issue for bucket lifecycle (we already had an issue open
>>> for object expiration though). We do have bucket location already
>>> (part of the multi-region feature). Object versioning is definitely on
>>> our backlog and one that we'll hopefully implement sooner rather
>>> later.
>>> With regard to object notification, it'll require having a
>>> notification service which is a bit out of the scope. Integrating the
>>> gateway with such a service whouldn't be hard, but we'll need to have
>>> that first.
>>>
>>> Yehuda
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Swami
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Team: As per the ceph document a few S3 APIs compatibility not supported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link: http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there plan to support the ?n supported item in the above table?
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> Any working on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes.  Unfortunately this table isn't particularly detailed or accurate or
>>>>> up to date.   The main gap, I think, is versioned objects.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there specfiic parts of the S3 API that are missing that you need?
>>>>> That sort of info is very helpful for prioritizing effort...
>>>>>
>>>>> sage
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux