On 27/06/2014 18:17, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic > > I don't intent to answer all questions, but some info, see inline > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >> TL;DR: what oneliner do you recommend to run upgrade tests for https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 ? >> >> Running the rados suite can be done with : >> >> ./schedule_suite.sh rados wip-8071 testing loic@xxxxxxxxxxx basic master plana >> > > It was replaced with teuthology-suite, see --help for more info > >> or something else since ./schedule_suite.sh was recently obsoleted ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8678 ). Running something similar for upgrade will presumably run all of https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/upgrade >> >> Is there a way to run minimal tests by limiting the upgrade suite so that it only focuses on a firefly cluster that upgrades to https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 so that it checks the behavior when running a mixed cluster (firefly + master with the change) ? > > You can run specifying argument with smaller suite, like this: > dumpling-x/parallel Hi Yuri, Thanks for the hint :-) It is documented https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/commit/7d2388b42c75f4526bc34c6a4b1b16637d967527 but it looks like it should be more generic because any level of subdirectories can be used. Cheers > >> >> It looks like http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=upgrade was never run ( at least that's what appears to cause http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8681 ) Is http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=upgrade-rados a good fit ? If so is there a way to figure out how it was created ? >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
