Re: Recommended teuthology upgrade test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Loic

I don't intent to answer all questions, but some info, see inline

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> TL;DR: what oneliner do you recommend to run upgrade tests for https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 ?
>
> Running the rados suite can be done with :
>
>    ./schedule_suite.sh rados wip-8071 testing loic@xxxxxxxxxxx basic master plana
>

It was replaced with teuthology-suite, see --help for more info

> or something else since ./schedule_suite.sh was recently obsoleted ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8678 ). Running something similar for upgrade will presumably run all of https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/upgrade
>
> Is there a way to run minimal tests by limiting the upgrade suite so that it only focuses on a firefly cluster that upgrades to https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 so that it checks the behavior when running a mixed cluster (firefly + master with the change) ?

You can run specifying argument with smaller suite, like this:
dumpling-x/parallel

>
> It looks like http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=upgrade was never run ( at least that's what appears to cause http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8681 ) Is http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=upgrade-rados a good fit ? If so is there a way to figure out how it was created ?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux