Delivery failure due to table format. Resending as plain text.
_____________________________________________
From: Sushma Gurram
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:35 PM
To: 'Shu, Xinxin'; 'Mark Nelson'; 'Sage Weil'
Cc: 'Zhang, Jian'; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support
Hi Xinxin,
Thanks for providing the results of the performance tests.
I used fio (with support for rbd ioengine) to compare XFS and RockDB with a single OSD. Also confirmed with rados bench and both numbers seem to be of the same order.
My findings show that XFS is better than rocksdb. Can you please let us know rocksdb configuration that you used, object size and duration of run for rados bench?
For random writes tests, I see "rocksdb:bg0" thread as the top CPU consumer (%CPU of this thread is 50, while that of all other threads in the OSD is <10% utilized).
Is there a ceph.conf config option to configure the background threads in rocksdb?
We ran our tests with following configuration:
System : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 0 @ 2.20GHz (16 physical cores), HT disabled, 16 GB memory
rocksdb configuration has been set to the following values in ceph.conf.
rocksdb_write_buffer_size = 4194304
rocksdb_cache_size = 4194304
rocksdb_bloom_size = 0
rocksdb_max_open_files = 10240
rocksdb_compression = false
rocksdb_paranoid = false
rocksdb_log = /dev/null
rocksdb_compact_on_mount = false
fio rbd ioengine with numjobs=1 for writes and numjobs=16 for reads, iodepth=32. Unlike rados bench, fio rbd helps to create multiple (=numjobs) client connections to the OSD, thus stressing the OSD.
rbd image size = 2 GB, rocksdb_write_buffer_size=4MB
-------------------------------------------------------------------
IO Pattern XFS (IOPs) Rocksdb (IOPs)
4K writes ~1450 ~670
4K reads ~65000 ~2000
64K writes ~431 ~57
64K reads ~17500 ~180
rbd image size = 2 GB, rocksdb_write_buffer_size=1GB
-------------------------------------------------------------------
IO Pattern XFS (IOPs) Rocksdb (IOPs)
4K writes ~1450 ~962
4K reads ~65000 ~1641
64K writes ~431 ~426
64K reads ~17500 ~209
I guess theoretically lower rocksdb performance can be attributed to compaction during writes and merging during reads, but I'm not sure if READs are lower by this magnitude.
However, your results seem to show otherwise. Can you please help us with rockdb config and how the rados bench has been run?
Thanks,
Sushma
-----Original Message-----
From: Shu, Xinxin [mailto:xinxin.shu@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 6:18 PM
To: Sushma Gurram; 'Mark Nelson'; 'Sage Weil'
Cc: 'ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; Zhang, Jian
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support
Hi all,
We enabled rocksdb as data store in our test setup (10 osds on two servers, each server has 5 HDDs as osd , 2 ssds as journal , Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31280) and have performance tests for xfs, leveldb and rocksdb (use rados bench as our test tool), the following chart shows details, for write , with small number threads , leveldb performance is lower than the other two backends , from 16 threads point , rocksdb perform a little better than xfs and leveldb , leveldb and rocksdb perform much better than xfs with higher thread number.
xfs leveldb rocksdb
throughtput latency throughtput latency throughtput latency
1 thread write 84.029 0.048 52.430 0.076 71.920 0.056
2 threads write 166.417 0.048 97.917 0.082 155.148 0.052
4 threads write 304.099 0.052 156.094 0.102 270.461 0.059
8 threads write 323.047 0.099 221.370 0.144 339.455 0.094
16 threads write 295.040 0.216 272.032 0.235 348.849 0.183
32 threads write 324.467 0.394 290.072 0.441 338.103 0.378
64 threads write 313.713 0.812 293.261 0.871 324.603 0.787
1 thread read 75.687 0.053 71.629 0.056 72.526 0.055
2 threads read 182.329 0.044 151.683 0.053 153.125 0.052
4 threads read 320.785 0.050 307.180 0.052 312.016 0.051
8 threads read 504.880 0.063 512.295 0.062 519.683 0.062
16 threads read 477.706 0.134 643.385 0.099 654.149 0.098
32 threads read 517.670 0.247 666.696 0.192 678.480 0.189
64 threads read 516.599 0.495 668.360 0.383 680.673 0.376
-----Original Message-----
From: Shu, Xinxin
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:50 AM
To: Sushma Gurram; Mark Nelson; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jian
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support
Currently ceph will get stable rocksdb from branch 3.0.fb of ceph/rocksdb , since PR https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/pull/2 has not been merged , so if you use 'git submodule update --init' to get rocksdb submodule , It did not support autoconf/automake .
-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sushma Gurram
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 2:52 AM
To: Shu, Xinxin; Mark Nelson; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jian
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support
Hi Xinxin,
I tried to compile the wip-rocksdb branch, but the src/rocksdb directory seems to be empty. Do I need toput autoconf/automake in this directory?
It doesn't seem to have any other source files and compilation fails:
os/RocksDBStore.cc:10:24: fatal error: rocksdb/db.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated.
Thanks,
Sushma
-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shu, Xinxin
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:00 PM
To: Mark Nelson; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jian
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support
Hi mark
I have finished development of support of rocksdb submodule, a pull request for support of autoconf/automake for rocksdb has been created , you can find https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/pull/2 , if this patch is ok , I will create a pull request for rocksdb submodule support , currently this patch can be found https://github.com/xinxinsh/ceph/tree/wip-rocksdb .
-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:12 AM
To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jian
Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support
Hi Xinxin,
On 05/28/2014 05:05 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
> Hi sage ,
> I will add two configure options to --with-librocksdb-static and --with-librocksdb , with --with-librocksdb-static option , ceph will compile the code that get from ceph repository , with --with-librocksdb option , in case of distro packages for rocksdb , ceph will not compile the rocksdb code , will use pre-installed library. is that ok for you ?
>
> since current rocksdb does not support autoconf&automake , I will add autoconf&automake support for rocksdb , but before that , i think we should fork a stable branch (maybe 3.0) for ceph .
I'm looking at testing out the rocksdb support as well, both for the OSD and for the monitor based on some issues we've been seeing lately. Any news on the 3.0 fork and autoconf/automake support in rocksdb?
Thanks,
Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06 PM
> To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
> Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jian
> Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support
>
> On 05/21/2014 07:54 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
>> Hi, sage
>>
>> I will add rocksdb submodule into the makefile , currently we want to have fully performance tests on key-value db backend , both leveldb and rocksdb. Then optimize on rocksdb performance.
>
> I'm definitely interested in any performance tests you do here. Last winter I started doing some fairly high level tests on raw leveldb/hyperleveldb/raikleveldb. I'm very interested in what you see with rocksdb as a backend.
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sage Weil [mailto:sage@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:19 AM
>> To: Shu, Xinxin
>> Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support
>>
>> Hi Xinxin,
>>
>> I've pushed an updated wip-rocksdb to github/liewegas/ceph.git that includes the latest set of patches with the groundwork and your rocksdb patch. There is also a commit that adds rocksdb as a git submodule. I'm thinking that, since there aren't any distro packages for rocksdb at this point, this is going to be the easiest way to make this usable for people.
>>
>> If you can wire the submodule into the makefile, we can merge this in so that rocksdb support is in the ceph.com packages on ceph.com. I suspect that the distros will prefer to turns this off in favor of separate shared libs, but they can do this at their option if/when they include rocksdb in the distro. I think the key is just to have both --with-librockdb and --with-librocksdb-static (or similar) options so that you can either use the static or dynamically linked one.
>>
>> Has your group done further testing with rocksdb? Anything interesting to share?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> sage
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"
>> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
________________________________
PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
