RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi sage ,  
I will add two configure options to --with-librocksdb-static and --with-librocksdb , with --with-librocksdb-static option , ceph will compile the code that get from ceph repository , with  --with-librocksdb option ,  in case of distro packages for rocksdb , ceph will not compile the rocksdb code , will use pre-installed library. is that ok for you ?

since current rocksdb does not support autoconf&automake , I will add autoconf&automake support for rocksdb , but before that , i think we should fork a stable branch (maybe 3.0) for ceph .

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06 PM
To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jian
Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

On 05/21/2014 07:54 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
> Hi, sage
>
> I will add rocksdb submodule into the makefile , currently we want to have fully performance tests on key-value db backend , both leveldb and rocksdb. Then optimize on rocksdb performance.

I'm definitely interested in any performance tests you do here.  Last winter I started doing some fairly high level tests on raw leveldb/hyperleveldb/raikleveldb.  I'm very interested in what you see with rocksdb as a backend.

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sage Weil [mailto:sage@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:19 AM
> To: Shu, Xinxin
> Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support
>
> Hi Xinxin,
>
> I've pushed an updated wip-rocksdb to github/liewegas/ceph.git that includes the latest set of patches with the groundwork and your rocksdb patch.  There is also a commit that adds rocksdb as a git submodule.  I'm thinking that, since there aren't any distro packages for rocksdb at this point, this is going to be the easiest way to make this usable for people.
>
> If you can wire the submodule into the makefile, we can merge this in so that rocksdb support is in the ceph.com packages on ceph.com.  I suspect that the distros will prefer to turns this off in favor of separate shared libs, but they can do this at their option if/when they include rocksdb in the distro. I think the key is just to have both --with-librockdb and --with-librocksdb-static (or similar) options so that you can either use the static or dynamically linked one.
>
> Has your group done further testing with rocksdb?  Anything interesting to share?
>
> Thanks!
> sage
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" 
> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo 
> info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux