Re: Librbd licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 10:22 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>
>> Ideally the change comes from Josh, who originally put the notice there,
>> but I think it shouldn't matter.  We relicensed rbd.cc as LGPL2 a while
>> back (it was GPL due to a header we used?) and got confirmations from all
>> authors.  It might be worth doing a quick check to make sure there aren't
>> committers for the affected headers that we didn't contact earlier.
>
>
> There's one.
>
> Greg, could you confirm that you consent to licensing your changes to
> librbd.h and librbd.hpp under LGPL2.1?

Definitely not a problem.
-Greg

>
> I think it's a good idea to fix the typo so it doesn't cause this
> confusion again.
>
> Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux