Re: A plea for more tooling usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/27/2014 03:19 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I wrote:
Sage Weil wrote:
If anybody is interested in helping with that effort, pull requests
are very welcome!  :)

[snip]

As hinted at in the patch, something like boost::program_options would
be nice, but that's a chunk of work & I'd rather hear feedback first
this way or the other. For the boost option, not sure if verbose error
reporting (the if (oss) parts) would translate over easily, I presume
that is deemed important?

Hi guys,

any further opinion on that? If no one feels strongly, I think I'll
just go ahead & hack something up with program_options, and see if
that looks more pleasant. :)

It'd be interesting if you could use boost::program_options just
for the binary-specific flags.

Trying to use it for all options, including those from
common/config_opts.h, is a lot more effort. There was some work towards
that a while ago, though the branch is no longer there:

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel/11139

Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux