On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Matt W. Benjamin <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > 1. there isn't support for for mark_down() yet (!), but we're working > on it. I've had good discussions with the Accelio team regarding exposing > explicit channel and flow control interfaces, which round out that topic > as we were exploring it. > > 2. the big changes in this push are major cleanups and bug fixes, plus > much wider integration with the user space code. my #1 action item from > our last convo was to first extend Xio coverage everywhere, and in particular, > add support for intra-cluster messaging over Xio. > > 2.1 on the cleanups and bugs front, starting with biggest, I finished support > for peer identification, using a small api change to Accelio (it's now on the > official Accelio for_next branch). a Connection refcnt underrun is fixed. then > I added a mechanism to bypass Accelio for intra-server messages, using a special > singleton connection. I cleaned up, but didn't deepen, feature support, as a > temporary measure. There's lot's of cleanup and various fixes in ceph_osd, too. > > 2.2 then, I did first cut integration with the MDS, and while at it, the Client > module as well. I've only started verifying, but so far it looks like the > intra-cluster messaging paths work, and a client workload may work--more fixes > likely forthcoming. > > I have a plan to get at least the starter policy interfaces like mark_down and > mark_down_all shorty. Cool. Let me know when those features are ready for a semantics review or there's something else we need to talk about. :) -Greg Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
