Re: contraining crush placement possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sheldon just
> pointed out a talk from ATC that discusses the basic problem:
>
>         https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc13/technical-sessions/presentation/cidon
>
> The situation with CRUSH is slightly better, I think, because the number
> of peers for a given OSD in a large cluster is bounded (pg_num /
> num_osds), but I think we may still be able improve things.


I'm surprised they didn't cite Ceph -- aren't copysets ~= placement groups?
Cheers, Dan

-- Dan van der Ster || Data & Storage Services || CERN IT Department --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux