Re: ceph-standalone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The packer solution sounds sensible to me as it also would allow the
creation of Docker images.

A basic Docker image has already been started
(https://index.docker.io/u/rochaporto/cephbox/) but it would be quite
useful to have a version that comes from an official maintained
source.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Kyle Bader <kyle.bader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> so that’s great. It’s already almost done. Let us know when you have managed updating it.
>>
>> I suppose it would be best if we could offer one image each of the last 3 Ceph versions (dumpling, emperor and firefly) so people can then play with the expected level they are looking for in either test environment or production environment.
>>
>> Each of the images would be maintained up to date for the last stable code base of each version only to reduce time consuming.
>
> This is screaming for us to use packer [1], that way we can easily
> create vbox/kvm/ec2 images from a file that we can stash in git
>
> [1] http://www.packer.io/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux