> How is it different from what is described above? There must be something I fail to understand. No misunderstanding on your part, on second look that does achieve the desired placement. Could you please help walk me through the following scenarios: Can data or local parity chunks that have been lost (erasures) be recovered locally, with no inter-dc backfill traffic? Global parity chunks that are lost require reading....6x data or global parity chunks (effectively 1x the original write)? Would placement groups containing a data or local parity chunk that have been remapped backfill from the local chunk (member of previous acting set)? Thanks! -- Kyle Bader - Inktank Senior Solution Architect -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html