Re: question about the data structure of crush_map

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In my opinion, w[i] is less than -1.

On 2 December 2013 11:53, Lipeng Wan <lipengwan86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dong,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Then is it valid to access the memory space
> specified by that negative id?
>
> L Wan
>
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Dong Yuan <yuandong1222@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If my memory serves me well, negative id means buckets (root, room,
>> rack, cabinet, etc.), well positive means osds.
>>
>> On 2 December 2013 11:20, Lipeng Wan <lipengwan86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I am reading the source code of ceph and trying to understand the data
>>> structure of crush_map. Now I am confused by the use of "struct
>>> crush_bucket **buckets" in function "int crush_do_rule(...)" in
>>> src/crush/mapper.c. It seems that the index of array "map->buckets[]"
>>> could be negative (see line 551, src/crush/mapper.c). I was wondering
>>> if anyone could explain why the index of this array can be negative
>>> and how those buckets were added into this array. Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> L. Wan
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dong Yuan
>> Email:yuandong1222@xxxxxxxxx



-- 
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1222@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux