Danny, It would be great if it is accepted. It would require as you noted, all contributers (external of enovance's employ if they have delegation of rights terms with their employees) and enovance's approval as well. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 17.10.2013 22:29, schrieb Andrew Woodward: >> We need to have a reasonable license on this preferably Apache 2.0. >> the enovance module is AGPL which can't come in contact with nearly >> anything with out causing massive license issues. Starting with any of >> the enovance code is a Non-starter as it will require the AGPL >> License. > > I agree with the Apache license. > > Would it be an option to ask enovance (and the contributers) to > relicense under Apache v2.0? I would be happy to do that for my > contributions. > > Danny > > -- If google has done it, Google did it right! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
